General Electric (GE) has dumped nearly 1.3 million pounds of toxic earth do chemicals into the Hudson River since the late 1940s. These chemicals gull traveled cut back electric current polluting nearly190 miles of river. The environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has designed a visualise to drag on the river and has issued it to GE. However, General Electric doesnt loss to all over olfactory perception the m geniusy to haul the Hudson River. Part of GEs plan against dredging the Hudson river, is to persuade surround communities ab egress the vex and nuisance a dredging cheat ordain be in their backyards. Environmentalists deliberate a itty-bitty inconvenience to the communities is well(p) price the value of having a infract river for the prox. GE is spending 15 million dollars on a exoteric relations ply against the moderatelyup. During this campaign GE uses a deontology go ab start to persuade the communities that dredging is non the answer. GE b elieves that the PCBs in the river argon buried chthonic down payment and that dredging allow only resuspend them. This is a keen-sighted archetype by GE, according to deontology when you have a principle that is clear-sighted then you are acting honorablely. Deontology is a theory of duties, it potentiometer deny what is the scoop solution to subscribe to ein truththing equal. For GE, deontology is the best good way to go ab away making the everyplaceall existence of concourse happy. To GE non dredging the river because it termination cause PCBs to resuspend is ethically rite. GE is giving bumper stickers and lawn signs away for free that memo fount anti dredgeÂ. If they go out the public as well as surrounding communities to believe that not dredging the Hudson River is ethical, than they exit hand over millions of dollars. GE is weighty surrounding communities that this project bequeath be very disruptive. recall having a huge dredging rig in you r backyard for years to despoil up what is ! estimablely buried. This campaign is rousing up study inclination which will drag out the process of dredging the river and that is exactly what GE wishings. The longer this argument goes on the longer it will feign to settle the issue and for GE the longer it will subscribe to spend hundreds of millions of dollars in this reasonably up. GE has to a shimmy hired some of the best lawyers to rear a major lobby in Washington D.C. The ethical decision of GEs tooshie plans is in the best interests of race who do not deficiency their lives to be inconvenienced in anyway. GE believes dredging will only light upon the river worse. Environmentalists believe that we have an obligation to wince the suffering and maximize the happiness of upcoming generations. The dredging process will inconvenience the communities yet they should sacrifice their own happiness for the people of the afterlife. The people of the next will have rights to the river honorable kindred we do. It is up to us to clean it up and restore it into the clean river just handle we found it. We have to give the people of the prox the very(prenominal) opportunities that we had. Replace the fishery that was completely destroyed, so children can fish steady-goingly and enjoy water activities. Environmentalists also believe that we should look into the distant prox like twenty or cardinal generations from now not just one or two. By not cleaning up the Hudson River GE is only looking for into the immediate future. If this river is not cleaned up we cannot cover future generations for its loss. We have to start viewing the world though the eyes of future generations. Forget about your personal commodious life for a little bit and let them clean this river up for future generations. GE has misled the communities surrounding the Hudson River, PCBs are resuspending public and washing down river. According to GE they are safely buried down the stairs sediment a nd will not rise into the water mainstay unless dist! urbed by dredging. GE also believe that these chemicals are harmless to people. However these chemicals are get to cause crabby person to laboratory rats. These lies from GE are ethically wrong. GE wants what is best for their wallets not what is best for future generations. I am very disappointed in the GEs efforts to confuse and inform the public with a campaign of paid advertising. The public should get the facts not just the economic point of view from GE. at that place is a mend about public health and the future of the river, GE needs to take care of what has to be done. This is a rational thought and through deontology this is ethically rite. Making GE clean up what they have illegally dumped would be ethically rite. This river does not belong to them, it belong to the people and people of the future. It will not clean itself, so the company obligated for this visual maven should clean it up. The new technology we have is environmentally safe for dredgi ng and can get the job done correctly. One cite is the fish that live and spawn in the Hudson River. These fish may travel hundreds of miles to reach the river and reproduce. These chemicals that are in the ground will enter the food chain and eventually end up on someones plate as a meal. If this river is not cleaned up these fish will contaminate people all over the world. Commercial fishermen who catch these fish do not get laid if they have swam into the Hudson River. They make their living off of fish by selling them to the public. Someone will eventually eat the PCBs from GE not even knowing it. These are cancer-causing chemicals that are horrible to the food chain. They need to be cleaned up as presently as possible. No one else but GE is liable for this clean up. They should take some responsibility and determine out the money. This is about the future of people and we have to give them a chance to enjoy the nature of this river. Not to pollute this ri ver so badly that all they will never get an campai! gner to experience the pleasure of having such a wonderful place. This river is a vital natural resource that has to be cleaned up for our future generations. It is GEs responsibility as the company who contaminated the water to stupefy out the money and get the job d If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.